Normalization of Turkish-Israeli Relations?

Normalization of Turkish-Israeli Relations?

February 26, 2014

The new normalization of relations between Turkey and Israel necessitates a paradigm shift in the nature of relations.

 
This Article
 

In recent weeks, it has been reported that Turkey and Israel may reach an agreement over two outstanding issues, including reparations for the families of the victims of the Mavi Marmara attack and disagreements over the blockade of Gaza. Subsequently, many have started to speculate about the "normalization of relations" between Turkey and Israel.

In some of these analyses, expectations about the future of this bilateral relationship have been held to too high of a standard, including hopes of a possible "back to the 1990s" scenario. It is therefore important to understand a few points regarding such predictions. Turkish-Israeli relations in the 1990s cannot be considered normal for two reasons. First, when we look at the historical development of relations between the two countries since 1948, the 1990s were an exceptional period that came about partly as a result of the optimism regarding the possibility of reaching a permanent peace with the Palestinians.

However, this period ended with the failure of the peace process. Secondly, the 1990s were not a normal period for Turkey on account of both political and economic instability as well as a significant degree of military tutelage over foreign and security policy. Thus, Turkey's relations with Israel were mostly security-oriented and controlled by the military. At this point, it is unrealistic to expect the emergence of 1990s relationship dynamic between the two countries.

The new normalization necessitates a paradigm shift in the nature of relations. The international system, the region and Turkey witnessed major transformations in the last 10 years which will impact Turkish-Israeli relations. One needs to take into consideration the changing dynamics of Turkish foreign policy decision-making, the role of public opinion, and the necessity of diversifying bilateral relations between two countries. Furthermore, a potential revival of the peace process would be the most significant dimension of the new normalization. In the absence of a peace process, relations will be vulnerable to any form of crisis in the region.

This article was originally published in Daily Sabah on February 26, 2014.

Subscribe to SETA Spot on Weekly Bulletin